<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thinking About The Doctor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepgeeking.com/2008/07/09/thinking-about-the-doctor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepgeeking.com/2008/07/09/thinking-about-the-doctor/</link>
	<description>Too Much Time On Our Hands: Opinions, Theories and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:59:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AchillesTriumphant</title>
		<link>http://www.deepgeeking.com/2008/07/09/thinking-about-the-doctor/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>AchillesTriumphant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepgeeking.com/?p=9#comment-127</guid>
		<description>There is a TV episode (The Deadly Assassin) where the Master effectively resets his regenerations by wearing the Sash and the Great Key of Rassilon and reveals the Eye of Harmony located beneath the Panopticon floor.  I&#039;m sure if he could do it the Doctor could - if it ever becomes an issue or even plot point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a TV episode (The Deadly Assassin) where the Master effectively resets his regenerations by wearing the Sash and the Great Key of Rassilon and reveals the Eye of Harmony located beneath the Panopticon floor.  I&#8217;m sure if he could do it the Doctor could &#8211; if it ever becomes an issue or even plot point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lambo</title>
		<link>http://www.deepgeeking.com/2008/07/09/thinking-about-the-doctor/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Lambo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepgeeking.com/?p=9#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Jim,

I don&#039;t see it as a Glitch.   I think it more she feared the Doctor she loves is going to change.  What will happen when he changed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see it as a Glitch.   I think it more she feared the Doctor she loves is going to change.  What will happen when he changed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lejon from Chandler</title>
		<link>http://www.deepgeeking.com/2008/07/09/thinking-about-the-doctor/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Lejon from Chandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepgeeking.com/?p=9#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Quote:
&quot;I think that the writers will find a way around the 12 regenerations, and find an “explanation”, however far fetched.&quot;

Agreed. The Master has had 15 or 16 regenerations now, and except for the most recent, those were all old school Who. So, yes, no matter how far-fetched, there will be an explanation.

This, however, raises an intriguing question. When they choose to increase the number of regenerations, will the doctor begin having ethical dilemmas. Will these additions to his normal life span be cause for more drama. 

I look forward to finding out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote:<br />
&#8220;I think that the writers will find a way around the 12 regenerations, and find an “explanation”, however far fetched.&#8221;</p>
<p>Agreed. The Master has had 15 or 16 regenerations now, and except for the most recent, those were all old school Who. So, yes, no matter how far-fetched, there will be an explanation.</p>
<p>This, however, raises an intriguing question. When they choose to increase the number of regenerations, will the doctor begin having ethical dilemmas. Will these additions to his normal life span be cause for more drama. </p>
<p>I look forward to finding out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BabylonLurker</title>
		<link>http://www.deepgeeking.com/2008/07/09/thinking-about-the-doctor/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>BabylonLurker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepgeeking.com/?p=9#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Quote :
&quot;2.) Now that the Doctor has regenerated again, does this mean that Tennant is both the 10th and 11th Doctor? If we decide to keep Old Series continuity (such as it is), does that mean the doctor only has 2 regenerations left? Or (and this seems more likely), do we chuck out the bit about 12 regenerations and give the Doctor the ability to live forever unless he chooses not to? It’s very confusing.&quot; 

I think that the writers will find a way around the 12 regenerations, and find an &quot;explanation&quot;, however far fetched.

And yes , as in the classic series, companions will come and go (or be left behind).

I think  we have to bear in mind that, in a sense, there is no such thing as *canon* in Doctor Who. There are simply too many inconsistencies and revivals of old foes.

I think the doorway for Donna is still open, the writers will have to be quite creative to do it in a credible way.

I am curious how the cybermen will return in this year&#039;s Christmas special.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote :<br />
&#8220;2.) Now that the Doctor has regenerated again, does this mean that Tennant is both the 10th and 11th Doctor? If we decide to keep Old Series continuity (such as it is), does that mean the doctor only has 2 regenerations left? Or (and this seems more likely), do we chuck out the bit about 12 regenerations and give the Doctor the ability to live forever unless he chooses not to? It’s very confusing.&#8221; </p>
<p>I think that the writers will find a way around the 12 regenerations, and find an &#8220;explanation&#8221;, however far fetched.</p>
<p>And yes , as in the classic series, companions will come and go (or be left behind).</p>
<p>I think  we have to bear in mind that, in a sense, there is no such thing as *canon* in Doctor Who. There are simply too many inconsistencies and revivals of old foes.</p>
<p>I think the doorway for Donna is still open, the writers will have to be quite creative to do it in a credible way.</p>
<p>I am curious how the cybermen will return in this year&#8217;s Christmas special.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lejon from Chandler</title>
		<link>http://www.deepgeeking.com/2008/07/09/thinking-about-the-doctor/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Lejon from Chandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepgeeking.com/?p=9#comment-39</guid>
		<description>As to &quot;the hand&quot;, yes, originally severed off in the Season 2 Christmas opener.
This ended up in the possession of Capt. Jack Harkness, so for at least 1 season of Torchwood it was proudly on display in the Torchwood headquarters (watch also, Torchwood). 

What annoys me about the bit about the hand and the Doctor&#039;s regeneration:
1.) the Doctor has never had the ability to choose his regenerated form, so keeping his looks is something wholly new.
2.) Now that the Doctor has regenerated again, does this mean that Tennant is both the 10th and 11th Doctor? If we decide to keep Old Series continuity (such as it is), does that mean the doctor only has 2 regenerations left? Or (and this seems more likely), do we chuck out the bit about 12 regenerations and give the Doctor the ability to live forever unless he chooses not to? It&#039;s very confusing.
3.) with Donna having now merged DNA and memory with the Doctor, will her offspring carry Gallafreyan traits (ie. like a spare heart)? Will we even see Donna again? Very unsatisfying.

With that, we do now seem to have a Doctor out on his own, so who will he eventually meet up with and form a new companionship? We&#039;ll see, I suppose.

I&#039;m looking forward to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to &#8220;the hand&#8221;, yes, originally severed off in the Season 2 Christmas opener.<br />
This ended up in the possession of Capt. Jack Harkness, so for at least 1 season of Torchwood it was proudly on display in the Torchwood headquarters (watch also, Torchwood). </p>
<p>What annoys me about the bit about the hand and the Doctor&#8217;s regeneration:<br />
1.) the Doctor has never had the ability to choose his regenerated form, so keeping his looks is something wholly new.<br />
2.) Now that the Doctor has regenerated again, does this mean that Tennant is both the 10th and 11th Doctor? If we decide to keep Old Series continuity (such as it is), does that mean the doctor only has 2 regenerations left? Or (and this seems more likely), do we chuck out the bit about 12 regenerations and give the Doctor the ability to live forever unless he chooses not to? It&#8217;s very confusing.<br />
3.) with Donna having now merged DNA and memory with the Doctor, will her offspring carry Gallafreyan traits (ie. like a spare heart)? Will we even see Donna again? Very unsatisfying.</p>
<p>With that, we do now seem to have a Doctor out on his own, so who will he eventually meet up with and form a new companionship? We&#8217;ll see, I suppose.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BabylonLurker</title>
		<link>http://www.deepgeeking.com/2008/07/09/thinking-about-the-doctor/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>BabylonLurker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepgeeking.com/?p=9#comment-37</guid>
		<description>On another note, the episode &quot;Blink&quot; written by Steven Moffat ha won this year&#039;s Hugo award in the category &quot;Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form.

Interesting that &quot;Doctor Who&quot; has now won the award in three consecutive years, all with the same writer : Moffat.

I am certainly looking forward to Moffat taking over from Russell T. Davies as showrunner in 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On another note, the episode &#8220;Blink&#8221; written by Steven Moffat ha won this year&#8217;s Hugo award in the category &#8220;Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form.</p>
<p>Interesting that &#8220;Doctor Who&#8221; has now won the award in three consecutive years, all with the same writer : Moffat.</p>
<p>I am certainly looking forward to Moffat taking over from Russell T. Davies as showrunner in 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BabylonLurker</title>
		<link>http://www.deepgeeking.com/2008/07/09/thinking-about-the-doctor/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>BabylonLurker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 16:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepgeeking.com/?p=9#comment-36</guid>
		<description>True - we have seen the severed hand several times since the Christmas special, but more often in season/series 4, I think

The Gandalf analogy is not too bad. I seem to remember that it is really more the TARDIS deciding when and where to go. Can someone confirm that ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True &#8211; we have seen the severed hand several times since the Christmas special, but more often in season/series 4, I think</p>
<p>The Gandalf analogy is not too bad. I seem to remember that it is really more the TARDIS deciding when and where to go. Can someone confirm that ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimC</title>
		<link>http://www.deepgeeking.com/2008/07/09/thinking-about-the-doctor/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>JimC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 04:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepgeeking.com/?p=9#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Jarsto:

Now that the season finale has run in the U.S., we can talk a bit more freely. We have been seeing that hand longer than Season 4.

The hand was cutoff in &quot;The Christmas Invasion&quot; which aired Dec. 25, 2005 in England. It was retrieved by and frequently seen with Capt. Jack on Torchwwod before the Doctor got it back at end of season 3.

The big questions include how many times will Davros return from the dead, how many times will Dalek army be rebuilt. We have seen the last of them several times before.

Dalek&#039;s were first seen in the second Dr. Who story, which began in Dec. 1963.

The season finale was the first time I recall seeing two copies of the same Doctor. There have been specials that brought together multiple Doctors along with some of their companions.

Glitch--Rose seems a bit unsure if Doctor will live when he is killed. The Doctor says he is leaving Rose with a copy of the Doctor &quot;just the way you met me.&quot; This is odd because Rose was introduced in Season One (new math) when Christopher Eccleston played the part. Rose saw him die and regenerate as David Tennant. Sarah Jane has also seen a regeneration.

As to the theme of Jarsto&#039;s post, long ago the Doctor was accused of causing trouble by showing up while he sees it as being drawn to times and places where he is needed. We saw this same set of interpretations of Gandolf&#039;s travels in &quot;The Lord of the Rings.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jarsto:</p>
<p>Now that the season finale has run in the U.S., we can talk a bit more freely. We have been seeing that hand longer than Season 4.</p>
<p>The hand was cutoff in &#8220;The Christmas Invasion&#8221; which aired Dec. 25, 2005 in England. It was retrieved by and frequently seen with Capt. Jack on Torchwwod before the Doctor got it back at end of season 3.</p>
<p>The big questions include how many times will Davros return from the dead, how many times will Dalek army be rebuilt. We have seen the last of them several times before.</p>
<p>Dalek&#8217;s were first seen in the second Dr. Who story, which began in Dec. 1963.</p>
<p>The season finale was the first time I recall seeing two copies of the same Doctor. There have been specials that brought together multiple Doctors along with some of their companions.</p>
<p>Glitch&#8211;Rose seems a bit unsure if Doctor will live when he is killed. The Doctor says he is leaving Rose with a copy of the Doctor &#8220;just the way you met me.&#8221; This is odd because Rose was introduced in Season One (new math) when Christopher Eccleston played the part. Rose saw him die and regenerate as David Tennant. Sarah Jane has also seen a regeneration.</p>
<p>As to the theme of Jarsto&#8217;s post, long ago the Doctor was accused of causing trouble by showing up while he sees it as being drawn to times and places where he is needed. We saw this same set of interpretations of Gandolf&#8217;s travels in &#8220;The Lord of the Rings.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BabylonLurker</title>
		<link>http://www.deepgeeking.com/2008/07/09/thinking-about-the-doctor/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>BabylonLurker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 18:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepgeeking.com/?p=9#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Good points.

When I went to the Eastercon in London, March this year they had a fun panel discussion called &quot;The doctor - Saviour or Trickster God?&quot; 

When it comes to authority figures, the Doctor has a tendency to come in, do his stuff and leave others to live with the consequences - a bit like The Shadows of Babylon 5 coming in, tipping over the anthill and leave the chaos behind for people to sort out.

What I like as well - this is a show that does not take itself too seriously. While it at times has good satire - it can make good fun of itself as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points.</p>
<p>When I went to the Eastercon in London, March this year they had a fun panel discussion called &#8220;The doctor &#8211; Saviour or Trickster God?&#8221; </p>
<p>When it comes to authority figures, the Doctor has a tendency to come in, do his stuff and leave others to live with the consequences &#8211; a bit like The Shadows of Babylon 5 coming in, tipping over the anthill and leave the chaos behind for people to sort out.</p>
<p>What I like as well &#8211; this is a show that does not take itself too seriously. While it at times has good satire &#8211; it can make good fun of itself as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarsto</title>
		<link>http://www.deepgeeking.com/2008/07/09/thinking-about-the-doctor/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarsto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepgeeking.com/?p=9#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I may well do that Michael. Although without a TARDIS of my own finding the time for it is probably going to be a struggle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may well do that Michael. Although without a TARDIS of my own finding the time for it is probably going to be a struggle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.deepgeeking.com/2008/07/09/thinking-about-the-doctor/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepgeeking.com/?p=9#comment-13</guid>
		<description>If your only exposure to Dr Who is the current series, then I&#039;d suggesting using the year or so with less new Who to catch up on the classic series.

Trust me..it&#039;s worth every last second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your only exposure to Dr Who is the current series, then I&#8217;d suggesting using the year or so with less new Who to catch up on the classic series.</p>
<p>Trust me..it&#8217;s worth every last second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
